this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
536 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19776 readers
4045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Elon Musk “one of the most unintelligent billionaires” she has ever met.

She criticized DOGE for placing unqualified 19-year-olds in Treasury positions and failing to do “their homework.”

Musk’s team has accessed the Treasury’s $6 trillion payment system, raising security concerns. Ocasio-Cortez warned of his “lack of intelligence and expertise,” calling him “morally vacant.”

DOGE has also shut down USAID and moved it under the State Department.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 55 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Can AOC run for president in the next election? Or is there some DNC blood oath that only shitty candidates can run?

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago

Only neoliberals can run

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, Americans are notoriously love intelligent women, especially if they're not white.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly think she has a real chance, TBH, although I can see the two cases where misogyny helped donvict into office....

I'm sure the cons and "liberal media" would do everything possible to paint her as the second coming of Karl Marx, though...even if most Americans actually agree with her policy positions on nearly everything, when you poll people on the issues.

But many Americans still think that Hillary (!) is some kind of radical leftist. Or that Obama is. Or that Biden is, or Kamala....after a while, trying to paint every single candidate as a Deep State radical Marxist fascist Communist socialist globalist (and every other stupid term they use with zero understanding of words) is going to wear off but still she has a HOOHAA is not white, so....

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In a slightly saner world she would be nobrainer. Smart, young, active, has enormous support base. In current US political climate being smart and young is a disadvantage and being a woman is a political suicide, unless you're very, very conservative.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

being smart and young is a disadvantage

I'm not so sure, Obama overcame being Bla, 2x, and part of that was due to him being smart (and young), I'm sure.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Let's run another old white moderate

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Dems won the election last time they did that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

If they can actually win, then: fuck yeah.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I for some inexplicable reason feel optimistic about this. I think large majority wouldn't mind as long as she had popular platform.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

If she had polulist conservative platform, sure, they will vote conservative anyway, and non-sexist part of the undecided could be swayed. With left leaning however, no chance. Her core base don't vote so they will fall off, a bunch of left leaning people prefer to be outraged to solutions so they will not vote because she will check 99 boxes out of 100 and for those people it might as well be satan incarnate, and a bunch of centrists will not vote for no woman something something sandwich. The rest are racists and will be outraged that a minority has an audacity to talk.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 1 points 11 hours ago

Mhmmm. Unfortunately most of these Americans aren’t USianb.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Its not a blood oath. They're a party on the center right. She's too far left for them.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"Too far left" for the Dems, yet popular with the so called "centrists". There is a lesson in there somewhere.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 18 hours ago

Someone left of someone on the right isn't necessarily left of center.