Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org -13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What???? Whoever wrote this sounds like he has 0 understanding of how it works. There is no "more privacy-friendly version" that could be developed, the models are already out and you can run the entire model 100% locally. That's as privacy-friendly as it gets.

Unfortunately it is you who have 0 understanding of it. Read my comment below. Tldr: good luck to have the hardware

[–] simple@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I understand it well. It's still relevant to mention that you can run the distilled models on consumer hardware if you really care about privacy. 8GB+ VRAM isn't crazy, especially if you have a ton of unified memory on macbooks or some Windows laptops releasing this year that have 64+GB unified memory. There are also websites re-hosting various versions of Deepseek like Huggingface hosting the 32B model which is good enough for most people.

Instead, the article is written like there is literally no way to use Deepseek privately, which is literally wrong.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

So I've been interested in running one locally but honestly I'm pretty confused what model I should be using. I have a laptop with a 3070 mobile in it. What model should I be going after?

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it Open Source? I cannot find the source code. The official repository https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 only contains images, a PDF file, and links to download the model. But I don't see any code. What exactly is Open Source here?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see the source either. Fair cop.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

Thanks for confirmation. I made a top level comment too, because this important information gets lost in the comment hierarchy here.

[–] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Obviously you need lots of GPUs to run large deep learning models. I don't see how that's a fault of the developers and researchers, it's just a fact of this technology.

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

There are already other providers like Deepinfra offering DeepSeek. So while the the average person (like me) couldn't run it themselves, they do have alternative options.

[–] azron@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Down votes be damned, you are right to call out the parent they clearly dont articulate their point in a way that confirms they actually understand what is going on and how an open source model can still have privacy implications if the masses use the company's hosted version.