this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

Books

10656 readers
50 users here now

Book reader community.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah how about fucking books written by AI hsvs to label by fucking law. Sick of AI taking away the arts. My ex today was showing off a app that lets her create songs with AI. She played this song and had a singer everything was awesome wasn't to bad. But when asked who the singer was she explained how she was. She wrote the song and let AI pick the singer she just fine tumed the music.

At first I thought it was Chris Daughter because it sounded a lot like him. No doubt this app steals the vocals from somewhere.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

counterpoint (not that this makes it easier) is that lowering the skillset needed for people to express and communicate what’s in their head has always led to more art and diverse perspectives being shared. it’s upsetting to artists that the skill they’ve spent their whole lives developing has less value now, but allowing more people to create is far from a bad thing in a lot of cases

[–] ultrahamster64@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

It doesn't "lower skillset needed to create", that can be achieved by making lowcost/free but powerful tools to be widely available.

What it does is lowering the bar on making something that's pretending to be decent but in actuality don't have time and effort put in it. Which means that the only thing it is going to led to is massive amounts of slop