this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
10 points (85.7% liked)

Casual Conversation

2045 readers
145 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dicksteele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Writing stories. Not very good ones but many of them at least.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Keep writing. As the late GREAT Ed Wood said: "Keep writing. Your story may not get better, but your writing will."

This is truth!

Source: I'm retired and I finance my living expenses through earnings from my fiction stories, not from my pension. :)

[–] dicksteele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, thanks for your lovely comment. I really wish to be in your position one day. How long have you been writing for?

[–] UniversalMonk@lemm.ee 1 points 54 minutes ago

I've been writing for about 15 years. Only got really serious about it about 3 years ago. And now I am retired, I take it way more seriously and am working on honing my craft. I've published stories here to Lemmy too.

I consider myself the world's 'okayest' writer, haha. But it's been working for me! Actually, the criticism I receive on Lemmy, especially the over-the-top petty and hateful comments, has been quite beneficial; it's great for brainstorming when I need someone incompetent or blindly loyal in my stories. These critiques inspire many of the characters in my narratives.

If you want, here are some fo the stories I've written on my Lemmy journey: https://lemm.ee/c/talesfromthedark