this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
1 points (53.3% liked)

Technology

1709 readers
524 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No chatgpt is censored (why is it even relevant, lol), and they censored it so well that it became pretty useless last time I've used it. But even compared to other chinese llms deepseek is censored too much.

No, I don't have a proof, I've tested it a bit and replies were full of factual errors, it tried to gaslight me multiple times, in general it behaves closer to something like llama 8b from two years ago. I haven't tried the "reasoning" model yet, maybe it's really great (openai one was shit, so no high expectations here).

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

After understanding your opinion, your comment seem to be reasonable but was put with bad presentation, imo.

I think being cautious might be a good point here. We are very early here and we will definitely see a better benchmarks for this model as the time pass. Which will prove or disapprove their benchmarks.

[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, sorry, as time goes on my english gets worse. 😺

[–] Cat@ponder.cat 0 points 2 days ago

My English communication skills sucks also. 😅

Hopefully, both of us improve. 😄