LGBTQ+

6250 readers

69 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC

Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

cityboundforest@beehaw.org

Kuromantis@beehaw.org

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

jennifilm@beehaw.org

UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

119

After his executive order on sex, is Trump legally the first female president? (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 days ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The mind boggles with the sheer absurdity of this administration, and it's not poised to improve. Be safe, y'all!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Didn't the order say something like, the person/thing that will produce the small or large sex cell?

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 4 days ago

___ means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the ___ reproductive cell

Scientifically, it's nonsense. There is no uniform line to be traced from "conception" to "reproductive cell".

Demagogically, a malicious interpretation could mean "only those who, through their genotype, could be traced from conception to reproduction, are a person".