this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
199 points (98.5% liked)

technology

23473 readers
262 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] horseloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Deepseek made a mistake with the first query I asked it, so from that sample of 1 I'm treating it with the same caution as any of the current LLMs.

I asked it about testing an electronics part (an Integrated Circuit chip) and it confidently told me how to test an imaginary 16-pin version of the chip.

The IC in question has 8 pins.

When I followed up by asking "why pin 16" it confidently responded with a little lecture about what pin 16 does and just how important pin 16 is.

Once I'd proved to it that the IC has 8 pins, I got this:

"You're absolutely correct that the MN3101 is an 8-pin DIP (Dual Inline Package) chip. My earlier reference to pin 16 was incorrect, and I appreciate your clarification. Let me provide accurate information for the MN3101 (8-pin DIP)."

The thing is that these chips have a unique Id (the name) and publicly available datasheets that explain, amongst other things, how many pins they have.

[–] tellmeaboutit@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

You can try the “deepthink” option or add the search option next time. Those options will eat up a lot of the context window but you’ll get much better results for technical questions. It’s still all just LLMs though so caution is warranted.