13
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
13 points (71.0% liked)
politics
19490 readers
4071 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Absolutely. 2028 is counterintuitively not for "anyone but Trump" but for someone more radical than Bernie to split the votes away from whatever milquetoast garbage candidate the DNC dreams up and give them a wake-up call, possibly even ushering in a multiparty system along the way.
Wow. So, throw the election to whoever the Republicans run, and you think that somehow, magically, we'll have a multiparty system as a result??
How about learn how the system actually works. Your advice is criminally stupid.
So there's one problem with your position: The current strategy is throwing elections to whoever the Republicans happen to be running. The DNC fossils won't learn their lesson by 2028 and it'll be another repeat of 2024 and 2016 until democracy in America finally dies.
And again, y'all are gonna solve this with (checks notes) ... wishful thinking? Wow. So glad you came up with that one! Surely that'll work!!
Well, y'all just failed to solve it by not listening and moving to the right. How many more election cycles are y'all gonna do that?
Again, blaming us for the actions of the so called elite.
Shut up and go lick some boots, class traitor.
There's the "not listening" I mentioned.
Democrats don't need to field a candidate if they're so worried about splitting the vote.
They have made it clear that they only see fascism as an opportunity to move right anyway.
Millions of people sat out the election because they couldn't be bothered to vote for a corporate apologist. There's nothing criminal about being stupid, but I think you'll find I'm not. There's absolutely nothing magical about splitting one in a two party system and ending up with three parties, it is in fact the most basic math. Whoever the Republicans run will be Trump, by the way, and I actually think that if it's made clear to the DNC establishment ASAP that the rabble is sick of the normal playbook there wouldn't be any need to take this strategy past the primaries. But go on with your unsupported knee jerk ad hominem. I have faith in democracy, let's wait a bit and see what the people think.
First past the post means third party candidates are never going to be viable. Pretending otherwise is burying your head in the sand.
But hey, you win, cause I'm magically never responding to anything you post ever again. Or something. Weirdo
Millions of people sat out the election because they are okay with fascism.
Millions sat out because they didn't see an appreciable distinction. At least the party got to move right.