Unity above all else. Absolutely. However Tankie rhetoric in good faith or from an agent provocateur is something that needs to be addressed directly. Any power structure without egalitarian praxis is antithetical to the movement. Communism and Anarchism are very similar to the point where there are anarcho communists.

I want to make sure that there is space for us to figure out self governance immediately after the revolution. I don't want to rely on a nascent "interim" government to hand it down to me.

https://viewpointmag.com/2018/06/11/intercommunalism-the-late-theorizations-of-huey-p-newton-chief-theoretician-of-the-black-panther-party/#f%209945%201%206

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

The thing is historically leftists ally with anarchists until they get power and then they execute the anarchists. They want unity as long as it's convenient for their agenda, but that's true of any philosophy that encourages power structures of any kind.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

Historically yes. Any transition of power is a dangerous time. There's a history of communists factions and bad faith actors working with fascists in Italy to murder anarchists who were planning to kill Mussolini. However that's not a conversation that's necessary this very second. Stratification of power and the way in which it's weilded is not lost on me. The problem with people that make bombs is sometimes the only cause they have is the one that necessitates bombings.

[–] ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

This.

Also, tankies are that not because they're communists (they're not, no matter how hard they insist) but because they support an oppressor on the same scale as the one they demand we unite with them to oppose, simply because said oppressor calls themselves communist (again, they're not), seemingly without understanding how that might make those of us opposed to all oppression mistrust them, and be unwilling to simply overlook their values and actions.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago

I'm someone with a leg in both tendencies, as it were. I purposely avoid getting too into the theory weeds, in favor of interacting with actual people. I see the word "tankie" used veeerrryyy liberally lately, and it feels like it doesn't signify very much. Respectfully, thinking about "immediately after the revolution" is getting way ahead of yourself, at least in relation to who you work with today.