this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
505 points (99.8% liked)

politics

19308 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 Republican-led decision, blocked certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs as the winner of a state Supreme Court race.

Riggs leads Republican Jefferson Griffin by 734 votes after recounts, but Griffin claims 60,000 ballots were illegally cast and seeks to have them invalidated.

The court will now hear Griffin’s challenge, with briefs due by January 24.

Democrats criticized the move as partisan, while the lone Democratic justice dissented, arguing there is no basis to delay certification or disrupt the election process.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Read? A lot of stuff, mostly in college and then specific areas of interest afterwards. I would suggest starting with classic liberal ideology and then tracking down the implementations of it in this specific case. If you disagree on the "reforms we care about" that's fine. I define it as universal suffrage, the right to bargain with your employer, and universal healthcare.

Examples? I did give one, Syria. Yeah it was a bit oblique, they're effectively a puppet of Turkey for now which is why the possibility of Russians being allowed to stay was alarming to NATO countries. It looked like Turkey might be trying out a Russian friendship. There's also Ukraine, Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, India, South Korea, etc. I'm not going to make an exhaustive list.

The important thing is some people think the French Revolution was cool songs and Hugh Jackman rescuing pretty girls. It was not. It featured fun things like Mass Drownings. And the Nantes was just convenient, the other Representatives on Mission were just as bloody, only less creatively. And the entire time this was going on France was fighting a civil war against Royal Loyalists across the country.

If you really want to get into this stuff I highly recommend getting to know a site like JSTOR. they have something like 100 free articles a month and a 20$/month subscription available for unlimited if you run into issues. Unfortunately time is a major component and even more fun is researching the researchers to weed out the authors with a large bias.