this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
159 points (94.9% liked)

Creepy Wikipedia

3935 readers
27 users here now

A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust

image

Guidelines:
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct

  2. Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy

  3. Strictly Wikipedia submissions only

  4. Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis

  5. Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.

  6. Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).

Mandatory:

If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy

image

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Montagge@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll take nature over 7.5 billion people including myself. What we've done to this planet is shameful and never should have gotten to this point.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are nature.

Were the cyanobacteria responsible for the oxygen crisis guilty? Plants contributed to the first of the five major recognized extinction events: https://www.sciencealert.com/the-arrival-of-tree-roots-may-have-triggered-mass-extinctions-in-the-ocean

The first major difference with us is that we're capable of being aware of how our presence changes the environment, and therefore of changing our behavior. So I think you think both too highly and not well enough of us.

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bacteria don't have the capability to be aware of what they were doing. Neither do plants. People do. That's all that matters.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that's my entire point. We have the capacity to change what we're doing and we are. I'm sorry it's not happening fast enough to satisfy you, but it is happening

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Montagge@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too little too slow too late.
20% reduction is still 6 trillion metric tons of greenhouse gases
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks
Lol it mentions carbon capture.
You should be getting angry instead of desperately clinging to bullshit hope.

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not both? Anger doesn't require hopelessness

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

"angry instead of clinging to hope"

Literally you just did lol