this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
1117 points (97.0% liked)

WTF

832 readers
5 users here now

The average c/WTF enjoyer

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In the age of DNA, it's going to be dangerous to do that. We need more of the safe boxes at fire stations. Of course, we also need rights, abortions, contraception, and family planning to be widely available, too.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a person who throws a baby in the trash isn't one who's thinking clearly. it's fear, panic and desperation. deterrents are not going to be a factor.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

And we already have a problem with women who have wanted pregnancies having severe mental illness episodes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenatal_depression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postpartum_depression

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 14 points 1 week ago

If you don't find the baby, no DNA. So much MUCH darker prospects..

[–] worsedoughnut@lemdro.id 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

DNA isn't magic, they still need a suspect to compare against.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but they have more and more samples to which to compare.