Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54539 readers

212 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

VPN for seedbox recommendations (distress.digital)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by reinar@distress.digital to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello, fellow linux ISO enjoyers,

as you may know, Mullvad VPN is disabling port forwarding 1st of July, which is a pity if you are serious about building that ratio.

Are there any other fast torrent-friendly vpn's with the ability to port forward and ideally ipv6? I have quite a number of torrents in my seedbox and was pretty happy with Mullvad since I was consistently able to squeeze around 800Mbps symmetrical from it, however it's time to move on.

Short rationale:
• You already have a seedbox, why bother with VPN?
Dealing with DMCA is pain and any hosting, which is sending complaints to /dev/null, has insane hardware prices for more demanding users. My seedbox is serving as a media archive since I seed everything I have indefinitely.

• You won't get complaints if you're using private trackers
Entry-level trackers are not bulletproof, I'm still using TL a lot and really, really don't want to move 10's of TB's of shit if asked.

Long story short: VPN works. The question is - which one?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you mean part of the 14 eyes, it wouldn't really be AirVPN that's part of it, but rather the government of the nation they're located in (Italy I think?). It means nothing about AirVPN itself, unless they do actually keep logs, in which case it'd mean that other 14 eyes member nations can ask the Italian government to tell AirVPN to hand over the logs pertaining to some citizen of their own nation that they can't otherwise spy on.

[–] jandefris@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for chiming in and expressing correctly what I was trying to convey.