this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
1311 points (98.2% liked)

Greentext

4645 readers
1075 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am almost certain, Google is doing the same with the pixels. My Pixel 6 suddenly lags or doesn't react on inputs.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

GrapheneOS.

Or maybe try looking at battery usage. Android is a piece of shit, including the apps included in it. Maybe an update changed the way one of them worked.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

GraphineOS without google play sandbox got me like 3days no charge

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think I'll need stock Android due to those two factor authentication apps for banking, which are not allowing to be ran on custom or rooted phones.

I really loved Cyanogen tho ...

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A lof of banking apps do work on grapheneOS: https://privsec.dev/posts/android/banking-applications-compatibility-with-grapheneos/

My battery life has been soo much better since Google Play can't do whatever it fucking wants anymore.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Some work, some are more of a pain in the ass (2fa for every single interaction even with biometrics enabled), and some don't work. You lose anything that relies on Google pay, so no public transit passes or anything like that, no tap to pay, etc. I put up with a google-free phone, but many aren't willing or simply don't have the same leeway I do.

And more to the point, the main graphene guy has unaddressed mental health issues and refuses to seek treatment (he appears to believe the problem is everyone else), and I genuinely don't feel comfortable with that one man show controlling my phone. Is google evil? Yes. Unstable? Not really, they are evil in generally predictable ways. I do actually hope he seeks help because nobody should live the way he does, but last I heard from earlier this year he's still up to his same old behaviors.

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

the main graphene guy has unaddressed mental health issues and refuses to seek treatment (he appears to believe the problem is everyone else)

Daniel Micay stepped down last year [1]. Also, he was allegedly being swatted which would put anyone on edge, considering someone has already been killed over it [2] and police aren't exactly known for treating people humanely.

I genuinely don’t feel comfortable with that one man show controlling my phone

Looks like there's 16 people involved in the project [3] - excluding any external contributors, that's definitely more than one. Granted, its probably the previous lead and the new one who have the most commits, I haven't looked, but its still not just a single developer. That said, your concern is valid. Smaller projects are more likely to die as soon as their main contributors lose interest or stop working on it for any reason - see the end of DivestOS as a prime example [4].

[1] https://androguru.com/2023/05/lead-developer-of-grapheneos-steps-down-amid-escalating-harassment-and-swatting-attacks/

[2] https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/14/us/swatting-sentence-casey-viner/index.html

[3] https://github.com/orgs/GrapheneOS/people

[4] https://www.divestos.org/pages/news#end

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep, I've seen this ~exact post a several times, same general structure and points, none of it acknowledging that the attacks on other people in the community started long before the alleged swat (no, I don't actually believe it based on every other persecution complex lie he's told, but that's neither here nor there).

Nor does it acknowledge that he "stepped down" seemingly in name alone, still having full control of the project (I'll admit I'm fuzzier on these details, I read a compelling breakdown but I can't first-hand corroborate so I'm not going to argue this point past saying "I hear things").

The real bottom line is this: I've been part of this community for years now and have been part of his chat rooms, and have seen first hand his behaviors towards other groups and towards his own supporters and users, all prior to the alleged swatting. You will not convince me he is healthy until I see some meaningful personal acknowledgement of his past behavior.

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep, I’ve seen this ~exact post a several times, same general structure and points, none of it acknowledging that the attacks on other people in the community started long before the alleged swat.

Just re-iterating what I've seen online - would love some sources or evidence to what you posted as those are 100% valid criticisms if true.

I don't really follow the drama but have seen others comment on it before. It's the reason I try to reply to posts with sources as I hate rumors being spread and the only way to combat misinformation is to provide evidence. What you claimed is pretty damning, if you're able to provide a soruce I would love to read and educate myself in adding more context to the situation. Thanks!