this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
80 points (79.9% liked)

196

16751 readers
3414 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
80
So long, farewell, auf wiedersehen, adrule (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

that's a lot of words. allow me to summarize your argument, and please correct me if i've misunderstood.

A. humans are rational creatures
B. rational creatures make rational choices, unless influenced by madness or sexual preference
C. being otherkin is a choice D. choosing to be otherkin is an irrational choice E. otherkin are not mad ∴ otherkin choose to be otherkin due to a sexual preference

your conclusion does seem to follow logically from your premises, though I don't think i agree with the truth of most of those premises.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I didn’t say sexual preferences are irrational, and I didn’t say other kin are irrational

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

i know. i laid it out point by point. i think its pretty clear i didn't claim you said either of those.