this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
105 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23389 readers
47 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's a continuous process, think of a conveyor belt. If the conveyor belt is 3 feet long or 3 miles long, the rate you can put things on it is the same.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now imagine making the conveyor belt wider.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Yes, that has nothing to do with the time the items have to sit on the conveyerbelt. This is a process that takes 3600x less time, not one with 3600x more throughput.

If they put 1 ton of iron ore in the furnace over a period of 1 hour, even if the iron is at the bottom of the furnace within seconds instead of hours, it doesn't enable them to add iron ore at a faster rate.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your made up scenario has absolutely nothing to do with how the process actually works though. You literally just made a straw man here. The reality is that the iron has to sit in the furnace for less time, and that means you can put more iron through the furnace of a particular size than you could otherwise. This really shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp, yet here we are.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh so it does have a higher throughput too.

You could have just said that.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

That is literally what I said in my first reply. 🤷

[–] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they put 1 ton of iron ore in the furnace over a period of 1 hour, even if the iron is at the bottom of the furnace within seconds instead of hours, it doesn't enable them to add iron ore at a faster rate

Cool. So, now they get to put several times more of the iron. I wonder if your argument is going to be 'but they will hit another bottleneck, then'.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

you just have to imagine that everything is immutable to dismiss this lol

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

a development of this magnitude will of course change how the production process is done, you don't harvest 10000acres of land with a 3 row combine.