this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
309 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22340 readers
19 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

nobody is prepared for what's coming

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteamedHamberder@hexbear.net 108 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

If socialized medicine ends up being called trumpcare omg.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 48 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Not that I think we're anywhere close, but I'd always expected it to come under a Republican anyway simply because the Dems always had the excuses that put their people to sleep. It's very opportune for us that this is happening as we head into the Trump years and libs are feeling their Resistance oats.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean

Wasn't the origins of the ACA a program Mitt Romney started in Massachusetts

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah RomneyCare basically straight from The Heritage Foundation.

[–] casskaydee@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

It was also very much not socialized healthcare

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The other reason why it could happen under republicans is that single payer healthcare would be a major boon to most other businesses other than health insurance companies and other healthcare system leeches, and those businesses have said so.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, I don't see that as outweighing Republican ideology against the government providing public services. It has a chance under Republicans because they'll be the ones under which the people can be mobilized to force them to do it. Never because they want to.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I definitely agree that republicans would be ideologically opposed to more public services. I should have added that it could happen under republicans in my dreams.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Gay marriage came under a Tory government.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago

jesus yeah you're right

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

We mustn't let the GOP mess with our healthcare. Look, Obamacare isn't perfect but...

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not just swallow our pride and coddle Donald Trump‘s ego if it means getting universal healthcare

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago

it wouldn't get through congress, and if it did it would have an "only for white people" clause

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sheeeeei id take Univ.healthcare called "i lick trumps elephant cock care" and smile on the fuckin drive to the clinic

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

This is what a potential MAGA social democracy modeled as the socdem version of MAGA communism would push for.