Yes and no. Yes, it is true that more uneducated people voted for Trump, and lack of education means people do not understand the risks and negative implications of voting for Trump over Harros for themselves. No, that argument doesn't explain the whole picture. It is also true that educated people who understand the implications voted for him anyway because they saw it as benefiting them/their worldviews. Keep in mind half of college educated male voters and over a third of college educated female voters went for Trump.

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Just an aside here to say I appreciate your unwillingness to over simplify this discussion.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Keep in mind half of college educated male voters and over a third of college educated female voters went for Trump.

USA educated* we just talked about how the education system is broken dude….

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure we can quibble about the median quality of a college education in the US, you you have to draw the line somewhere. But the issue I'm pointing at is people get lazy conflating education with social progressiveness and egalitarianism and dismiss people with different worldviews as "uneducated". There are plenty of intelligent well-educated people who are morally bankrupt or deeply mistaken. After all, eugenics came from some of the most "educated" minds in the world.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you buy into the propaganda, that means you aren’t educated nor intelligent, sorry dude. You can be rocket scientist and still be considered uneducated and unintelligent.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

My friend, the messages that only uneducated people can be pro-fascist and educated people are immune to propaganda is propagandistic. It's reductive and misleading. Evil does not limit itself to the ignorant. Still,I think we have different meanings of "educated"