this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
986 points (86.4% liked)

Science Memes

11148 readers
4071 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And even if we just buried all of it, all nuclear waste ever produced could easily be buried in one square mile.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We need a fitting location to safely bury it in. Otherwise it can pollute the ground and water. In Germany for example we dont have such a location. That and the issue of cost, no one wanting to build it, no one wanting to insure it, no state wanting to offer the space and no energy company wanting this energy led to us making the correct decision in moving away from it

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We don't add that level of scrutiny to coal ash which there is much more of and equally dangerous forever. Nuclear is the the only power source expected to address 100% of problems at any point in the future before it can even start construction.

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

We are phasing out coal. I am not arguing against further researching nuclear energy. Current plants are not worth it to build though.