this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
606 points (94.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3522 readers
6 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.world
606
Considering last night's results, I don't expect NATO to be credible 4 years from now (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (11 children)

It isn't credible now. It likely won't exist at all in 4 years. Unless it cedes even more decision making authority to the US and becomes even more of a puppet.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't all authority already lie with the USA? If we're going to be real, I mean. I'm sure France thinks otherwise but let's be real: NATO was always the "Uncle Sam will protect Europe from Russia"-treaty.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

France knows this, that's why it wasn't in NATO for most its history. This only changed when one of our president needed war crime buddies

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

C'est faux. France is one of the founding members of NATO, however for much of the time it was under a French Command instead of a combined command.

load more comments (9 replies)