this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
286 points (93.3% liked)

Transgender

159 readers
243 users here now

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know a lot about this. If the United States wants to subpoena records from an instance admin based outside of the United States, do they have to comply?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's pretty murky, ignoring a subpoena is a crime, so US may be able to charge them with obstruction and request extradition, it's then on their home countries to decide whether to accept the US's requests. Either way I'm sure it would make them ever traveling to the US very tense.

See: Julian Assange

Remember though, these instance admins are generally doing this out of the kindness of their heart on shoestring budgets, it's so much safer and easier for them to just comply with legal requests. They're nice people, but not political martyrs.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

For extradition, you'd first have to know who the instance admin is.
I don't think foreign ISPs will (or are even allowed to) react to a US request for information.
So the US would have to request that info from the foreign country's government via diplomatic channels.

Thanks, that makes sense. I wasn't sure what to even consider for that kind of thing, but I do recognize these admins are just ordinary folks.