this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22765 readers
438 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by some of the discussion in this thread. I don't think it's appropriate place for that discussion there, but hey why not have a separate thread for it

If I think religion is not good in general, am I Reddit and cringe and basically Richard Dawkins?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, I do not consider that way of thinking to be compatible with being a good communist

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree, I think I and every person on this site is a better person than say, an IOF soldier, and I don’t think that’s a stretch to say.

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you think an IOF soldier is just "someone you consider to be wrong"? they are fascist murderers
Bizarre thing to say in the context of this conversation

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I also consider myself better than a Zionist who hasn't themselves killed anyone

In general I think being right is unquestionably better than being wrong

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I general I think being right is unquestionably better than being wrong

That isn't what you said, you asked if others think themselves better than people who are wrong
Do you consider yourself better than the masses? Most of them are not marxists, so are wrong about a lot of things
Dragging the israeli nazis into this is frankly ridiculous given that this is a thread about religion and not ethno-nationalism

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'm not separate from the masses. I am a part of most politically advanced section of the masses, which is indeed better than being a part of the most backwards sections of the masses, who are fascists and reactionaries.

Thinking something is correct or good simply because the masses believe it is the crudest form of tailism.

Also, I'm not the one who brought up Israel. I was merely responding to you

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thinking something is correct or good simply because the masses believe it is the crudest form of tailism.

Seeing as you edited this in after i disengaged I will respond to it
Where did I say anything like that? I explicitly said that the non-marxist masses are wrong about a lot of things
And again, you specifically said think yourself better than
Is this some bad faith trolling attempt?

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You posted your disengagment (which I respected by the way) while I was editing my comment.

I also don't know why you would think I'm attempting to troll you, when everything I've said has been perfectly civil, if not in agreement with you.

You asked if I consider myself better than the masses because they have incorrect views. And the answer is no because I am part of the masses. How can I be above the masses while being a part of them?

But neither does being part of the masses excuse incorrect views. It is demonstrably worse to be a reactionary than not. It is in fact better to be a Marxist and a communist. Seeking to justify yourself by reference to the incorrect views of the masses, as if backwards views are not something to be combatted, which itself requires a value judgment, is tailism.

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

But neither does being part of the masses excuse incorrect views. It is demonstrably worse to be a reactionary than not. It is in fact better to be a Marxist and a communist. Seeking to justify yourself by reference to the incorrect views of the masses, as if backwards views are not something to be combatted, which itself requires a value judgment, is tailism.

This is why I think you are trolling me
Show me where i "justified myself by reference to the incorrect views of the masses"
Or does "think yourself better than someone else" mean something different to you?

[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That isn't what you said, you asked if others think themselves better than people who are wrong

Do you consider yourself better than the masses? Most of them are not marxists, so are wrong about a lot of things

Right here

What is your point if not to say that no value judgment ("better than") can be made against those sections of the masses with backwards views ("Most of them are not marxists, so are wrong about a lot of things")? You're not better than a fascist, simply because the masses include fascists? That's tailism my friend

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, I see the issue, I think we see the words "consider yourself better than" differently
To me thinking yourself better than someone is less about ideology and views and more something inherent, as in "This person is lesser because they believe in the wrong god, or worship the same god wrong"
I apologize for my tone earlier

Gotcha. I definitely see where you're coming from better now. I withdraw my accusation of tailism

rat-salute