this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
472 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
4651 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
472
Trying to reverse climate change won’t save us, scientists warn (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
140 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

There are gasses and particles that can be released into the atmosphere that will reflect sunlight and warmth away from earth. In theory that could be done very quickly.

We’re not as powerful as we think we are.

We could cause a new ice age easily. Just fire off a few percent of the nukes, and we will revert to an ice age almost immediately.
Of course a side effect would be massive starvation.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There are gasses and particles that can be released into the atmosphere that will reflect sunlight and warmth away from earth. In theory that could be done very quickly.

As far as I remember, that was tried with ships and it has some collateral effects that cause different damages to the oceans.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I recall the opposite. After having somewhat cleaner fuel, the ships cleaner exhaust caused more warming as the sulfur in the fuel was having a side effect of mitigating warming somewhat. It was raised as a point of maybe we should consider the approach of we are in dire straights.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 3 weeks ago

I remember to have read that change caused some other problems, and these collateral problems were unexpected.

But I don't remember if the problem were about the ocean currents or that the ocean was warmer or a mix of the two plus something else.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How is that relevant to ships? It's released to high in the atmosphere.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 2 points 3 weeks ago

My point was that this already tested on a smaller scale with ships: the fuel changed and that changed the exhaust fumes ability to reflect sunlight which cause some problems the proponents of the solution have not foresee.