this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
1211 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

10988 readers
1955 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I imagine a physicist would invoke entropy to describe the diffusion of pressure waves and vibration into other forms of energy. Neuroscience might explain the propagation of signals from the cochlea into the brain. A psychologist could hypothesise on the influence of music on our mood and ideas. A philosopher might talk about the influence of music on the way we build our society and how that feeds back into our music. In this way, the music never stops, it continues on as echos rippling through through the universe.

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I think this is my favorite comment I've read on Lemmy so far.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We didn’t start the music, it was always playing since the world was turning

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Beautiful. We are just one of many instruments that express the music.

[–] Detheroth@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That gave me some real Alan Watts vibes. If this came from your own brain, be proud of this comment. Beautifully worded and inspiring.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Thank you and funny you should say that because Watts is an inspiration. From a scientific point of view some of his ideas were a little tenuous but as a teacher on the subject of the ineffable he was quite peerless.