this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1245 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

ChatGPT? Then everyone should assume this is horse shit until verified.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Equus simplicidens, also known as the Hagerman horse, lived around 4 million years ago in North America and is considered an ancestor of modern horses, zebras, and donkeys[3][5]. These animals relied on speed, stamina, and herd behavior for protection against predators such as early wolves and big cats[3]. Their survival was supported by strong social structures and collective awareness[3]. Over time, Equus species migrated to other continents via land bridges[4]. They eventually went extinct in North America around 10,000 years ago during the Pleistocene extinction event[1][2][4]. Horses were later reintroduced to the continent by humans in the late 15th century[4].

Citations: [1] POST-PLEISTOCENE HORSES (EQUUS) FROM MÉXICO https://meridian.allenpress.com/tjs/article/74/1/Article%205/487323/POST-PLEISTOCENE-HORSES-EQUUS-FROM-MEXICO [2] Horses in North America: A Comeback Story | Blog | Nature - PBS https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/blog/american-horses-horses-in-north-america-a-comeback-story/ [3] The Hagerman Horse (Equus simplicidens) - National Park Service https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/equus_simplicidens.htm [4] Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife https://awionline.org/content/wild-horses-native-north-american-wildlife [5] Park Archives: Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument https://npshistory.com/publications/hafo/index.htm [6] American Zebra (Equus simplicidens) - iNaturalist https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/317782-Equus-simplicidens [7] Hagerman Horse - Start Packing Idaho https://www.startpackingidaho.com/blog/hagerman-horse/

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So, what, did ChatGPT just rip this off wikipedia?

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I have no doubt that the majority of LLM models have trained on Wikipedia articles

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Yes. If you check the other top Google results you'll frequently find the articles they plagiarized.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I do have a custom instruction to use Wikipedia as a source where possible.

The difference is i dont need to know what i am looking for i can just ask some a basic question.

Llms are limited and for that reason vey hated on lemmy but they can be very useful when configured right.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bro...

Just link the Wikipedia.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That requires knowing the names of the pages i need which is practically never the case.

If i have plenty of time to do a deepdive sure but here i wanted a quick fact of the day kinda thing.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.

I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia

It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

and they're correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites