Hardware

764 readers

359 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.

Rules (Click to Expand):

Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.

Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Rekall_Incorporated@lemm.ee to c/hardware@lemmy.world

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By 3 frames per second at over 260 fps for a savings of 80 watts.

Spend your watts on a better graphics card babe.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be honest, I don't think that's too bad of a trade-off, but I can see how this would be controversial in the context of desktop computing.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

it's bizarre how IHVs will absolutely crank power for such marnigal gains in average fps :(

I'm happy ARL is taking this approach.