this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
57 points (98.3% liked)

technology

23180 readers
432 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With this project falling behind, and the reducing likelihood of delays in the Lunar Gateway/Artemis program, I think there's a good chance that NASA and the ESA will not have access to a space station following the ISS's decommission. It's not the only "public-private" partnership for an ISS successor, but I don't think the other candidates are making much progress either.

I also thought that this quote was pretty amusing, and highlights the futility of trying to privately fund commercial station projects:

To bring in some much-needed cash, Axiom Space started selling seats for trips to the ISS on board SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft.

It was also awarded a NASA contract to fund a space suit for the first crewed mission to the lunar surface, Artemis III.

But the suit appears to have been a massive distraction — not to mention a major money pit — from its plans to build a space station. SpaceX trips to the existing orbital outpost were also not a sustainable solution to Axiom Space's woes.

"Turns out that there's not a lot of billionaires that want to set aside their life for 18 months to go train to be an astronaut for the ISS," a former Axiom executive told Forbes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My favorite :agony-turbo: one of those is "we're not gonna put this lunar rover that we already built on a rocket that we're gonna launch anyway so :my-hero: can get more money"

Meanwhile China has I think three lunar rovers currently on the moon roving.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

The bazinga car commercial in space moment was deeply demoralizing to me, and even on Hexbear there were some "I'm a leftist butt " treat defenders trying to justify that aforementioned publicly-subsidized bazinga car commercial in space with bullshit excuses like "it was a payload test for the mission(tm) and they decided to have a little fun with the payload test, did you expect them to not have fun?" bootlicker

The answer is yes. I didn't ask to subsidize a fucking bazinga car commercial in space.

If the Apollo moon landing had a mandatory Coca-Cola sign installation moment "for fun" that'd have been crushing for me too.

[–] CascadeOfLight@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago

I would support the use of a nuclear weapon in space if it was used to evaporate that car xi-plz

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They just couldn't think of a single better use for three thousand pounds of payload to solar orbit, right, sure.

The Falcon 9/heavy is the best amerikkkan launch system since Saturn but that's not a high bar.

[–] anonochronomus@hexbear.net 3 points 6 hours ago

Considering the Saturn rocket program was run pretty much entirely by paperclipped nazis, I'm gonna have to go ahead and say "nothing new under the sun."

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'd have accepted pretty much anything but an obnoxious flex from a private corporation and its products.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Call like any university and say "hey you got 3000 pounds of shit you want on a solar orbit? It might blow up, this is a test flight" And the answer will be "Yes, absolutely!"

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

I would have been fine with that. It may have actually promoted the bazinga corporation more than a narcissistic product flex, but this was my-hero