Firstly, I know you're not going to justify genocide by saying the survivors of that genocide get to have casinos. That's so outrageously, ghoulishly evil that you can't possibly have meant that and I must have misunderstood.

Secondly, where do you get the idea that capitalism started in America in 1860?

Thirdly, you ignored everything else I asked you to add up. You made no mention of slavery, or the Global South.

Fourthly, what's fundamentally different between the colonial exploitations of mercantilism and private exploitations of capitalism?

I call your arithmetical integrity, or more laughably your ability, into question.

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lol. You definitely misunderstood. I didn't say in my comment that TOT was okay because now they have cassinos. I'm not sure how you could possibly get that out of what I wrote. The claim I'm arguing against is that capitalism has caused more deaths than communism, which isn't the case. Especially since capitalism wasn't America's economic governing factor until - yup - the 1860. Capitalism wasn't the cause of the TOT, but it was the cause of the survivors ability to create wealth for their tribes.

Again, because you somehow twisted what I wrote into saying it's okay that all those people died because casinos, the TOT was horrific. It shouldn't have happened. Nothing can make up for that, even the wealth made by their survivors. But it wasn't caused by capitalism, which is the original claim.

And no, I wasn't ignoring everything else you pointed to in terms of deaths under capitalism, because slavery and other horrors certainly were due to capitalism here in America. Though, it has nothing against rhe numbers stacked under communist rule.

I also want to point out that there are going to be deaths under every form of economic governance, because that's just human nature. There will always be people that kill other people, for a variety of reasons. The goal, then, is to find the one governance that kills the least amount of people in total.

I'll also point out that it's not like capitalism was absent one day in America, and then suddenly it was governing the country. Capitalism, like most forms of economic rulings, was a slow creep. It happened in small stages until the 1860s, when it became the dominating force in America.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Though, it has nothing against rhe numbers stacked under communist rule.

Let's see the numbers side by side then, since you're so confident