this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
165 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Strange. That seems to go against the Home Office's own Code of Practice

"13 3.2.2 Any proposed deployment that includes audio recording in a public place is likely to require a strong justification of necessity to establish its proportionality. There is a strong presumption that a surveillance camera system must not be used to record conversations as this is highly intrusive and unlikely to be justified"

I hope they've taken good legal advice.

[–] Zorothamya@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

I just realized that it forgets about deaf and mute people. Why do we have surveillance cameras and are fine with it because they at least don't listen in on our conversations but draw the line on audio recording, when all this time video surveillance was already intruding on the privacy of the conversations of deaf and mute people who have to rely on sign languages to communicate?

(note this isn't me defending audio or video recording, fuck that. this is just me realizing how that specific law doesn't account for disabilities)

[–] Mex 4 points 2 months ago

There are probably technical things they can do to reduce the risk, such as only actually record audio above a set audio pressure level.