Greentext

4508 readers

1821 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

1309

Posting the shopping cart theory because people had questions in a separate thread (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 months ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

444 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

From a utilitarian perspective

Pretty sure that's not what utilitarianism means lol

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maximizing the utility of labor? I'm alluding to using the components of the scenario in the most efficient way.

How would you express it?

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

The "utility" of utilitarianism isn't that type of utility. IIRC it generally refers to the idea of maximizing happiness and minimizing harm, with a focus on outcomes of the whole, rather than the individual. Efficiency of labor doesn't explicitly factor into it.

Personally, I think you're just rationalizing being lazy and potentially causing harm to others, which isn't utilitarian at all.