this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)

New Communities

16853 readers
13 users here now

A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

Rules

The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.

1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.

2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.

Formatting

Please include this following format in your post:

[link text](/c/community@instance.com)

This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't

You should also include either:

!community@instance.com

or instance.com/c/community

FAQ:

Q: Why do I get a 404?

A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.

Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?

A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.

Image Attribution:

Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another SFW community: !guitarporn@sfw.community . Whether you have a large collection or just that one special piece of gear that you love, this is the place for you to show it off.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The "implied perverse thrill" seems a bit of projection on your part, and the idea of "visually appealing/stimulating images that have no context and at best provide a simulacrum of interest in the object or activity" is a very good definition of porn.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The “implied perverse thrill” seems a bit of projection on your part

You can read the critical reception of the film yourself here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saw_(film)#Critical_response

A sample of adjectives: "nasty", "nihilistic", "mean", "insinuatingly creepy", "derivative", "loathsome", and, yes, "perverse"

“visually appealing/stimulating images that have no context and at best provide a simulacrum of interest in the object or activity”

what a silly self serving definition. "porn" has a particular meaning which you can look up in the OED, Cambridge, Websters etc. Definition 3 is how it was used - with negtive connotation - for "torture porn" and (the example in MW) "the pornography of violence".

The extension of that to mudane everyday things (food, cars, guitars) and especially when the material shared typically falls well short of "sensational" is just a lazy habit that reddit picked up (and other online spaces too) that I, and clearly others in this thread, think Lemmy wouldbe better without. etto...

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's a bit self-serving. Thing is, I could not think of other term to convey this idea as succinctly. Maybe "Fetish" would be better, but it would still carry sexual connotations.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why does everything have to be sexualised and sensationalised? That's encouraged on Reddit, and any other profit driven social media, because they're bending over backwards to bleed you dry of engagement. It's thoroughly unpleasant.

Lemmy has a chance to be something different. BestGuitarPics is what you're actually curating. Or AwesomeGuitarPics if you want a little something extra. Jamming "Porn" on to everything just to try and stir a sense of interest is just sad.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Best Guitar Pics" is dull and completely unimaginative. It's the "Microsoft Approach of Naming Products (TM)"; which does not allow itself to take any risks and ends up being soulless, corporate, empty. Or to use a more contemporary reference: it's the type of slop that ChatGPT would produce if someone asked "suggest a name for a community for people to share pictures of guitars".

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Best Guitar Pics"

merely an example. Be sure to let BestOfLemmy etc know..

"dull and completely unimaginative"

and your solution is to tack "Porn" on the end? oh dear

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are choosing to ignore the rationale for the name:

  • visually stimulating pictures
  • lacking deeper meaning
  • poor substitute or connection with the actual object/activity

"Best", "Awesome", "Aww" and any other suggestions that I've heard do not convey these ideas. And to me these ideas must be expressed. If you can come up with anything that can succinctly make these points across without resorting to porn/fetish analogies, then I will gladly consider them. But if you just want me to change it because it offends your sensibilities, then I am sorry but I will simply ignore you.