this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
44 points (97.8% liked)
China
2032 readers
31 users here now
Discuss anything related to China.
Community Rules:
0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.
1: Don't go off topic.
2: Be Comradely.
3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.
讨论中国的地方。
社区规则：
零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。
一、不要跑题。
二、友善对待同志。
三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I agree, in my opinion train infrastructure should just be subsidized by the state and made as affordable as possible. EVs are great, but removing cars from the road is even better. There's simply no comparison between the volume of people that trains and cars can move.
I think that electric vehicles could, or at least should, always have a place.
I think trains and public transport should be heavily subsidized as much as possible, and I understand the arguments and heavily support in favor of making cities more walkable and not requiring a car, but if I'm plowing my girl in the next city over, it might be more economical for me to drive there personally than getting a train ticket.
Edit: Also, I think there is a happy "middle-ground" (I hate that phrase, but regardless) of having cities that allow cars but also are very walkable.
Yeah, I think it's a combination of all these things in practice. You want to make cities walkable to reduce local traffic. You want to have good train infrastructure so people can get around the country. And then you have cars for additional convenience. If public infrastructure is good enough then it reduces the need to drive, and cars aren't a problem at that point.