Malicious Compliance

19585 readers

1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

140

Sandwich residents mock gas company SGN over half-finished paint job on 20mph road marking in New Street (www.kentonline.co.uk)

submitted 2 months ago by i_am_not_a_robot to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A half-finished paint job on a Kent road has been described as a perfect example of “not my job, mate” culture.

Gas company SGN has been carrying out works in Dover Road and New Street in Sandwich throughout the summer.

The network upgrades are now finally complete - but that is more than can be said for the repainting of a 20mph marking near the Malcolm Waite petrol station.

SGN workers have only put a fresh coat of white on the sections of the road they had to dig up, leaving glaring gaps.

A spokesman for the gas company says it is “responsible for reinstating the areas we’ve disturbed”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ScreamingFirehawk 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If the council maintained the road markings like they are supposed to then companies meeting their obligations to repaint markings would never make the news. It only gets picked up on when the original marking is basically non existent anyway.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, 100%. This is the town's fault IMO - not maintaining the markings in the first place (it's not the contractor's fault that the old marking is non-existent), and then probably refusing to pay the contractor "extra" to repaint the whole thing.