UK Nature and Environment

420 readers

41 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Kim

GreyShuck

Cyanide levels in Walsall canal improve following toxic spill (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 4 months ago by GreyShuck to c/nature

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The levels of cyanide in a Walsall canal impacted by a major chemical spill have "improved", according to the organisation leading the clean-up operation.

About 4,000 litres (879 gallons) of sodium cyanide and other chemicals leaked into the canal on 12 August, closing a 12-mile stretch of the waterway and killing thousands of fish.

A clean-up operation by the Canal and River Trust (CRT) is underway, after it raised more than £20,000 to fund the work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why is the canal and river trust needing to fundraise to clean up a company's mess?

[–] GreyShuck 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As the article about the donations, linked to within this article, says:

"Of course, the company responsible should pay, but the timing and outcome of the investigation by the Environment Agency (EA) is uncertain, and we must act now to protect nature as best we can."

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

The companies should be paying for the cleanup, they can then appeal against the cleanup cost if they can prove it was not them. Had enough of this bullshit. Guilty until proven innocent for environmental damage

load more comments (1 replies)