this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
109 points (89.8% liked)

News

23644 readers
3351 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The news mod team has asked to no longer be a part of the project until we have a composite tool that polls multiple sources for a more balanced view.

It will take a few hours, but FOR NOW there won't be a bot giving reviews of the source.

The goal was simple: make it easier to show biased sources. This was to give you and the mods a better view of what we were looking at.

The mod team is in agreement: one source of truth isn't enough. We are working on a tool to give a composite score, from multiple sources, all open source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think the problem arises from the fact that I don't know what you mean by "this news outlet is shit". Maybe we can define exactly what we mean here and block such news sites from being posted.

I don't think bias can be correlated with article quality, and we should be engaging with articles and ideas based on the merits within, not some aggregate made up thing like "bias". I'm not saying it's not a real thing, just that it's made up and subjective enough to be in my view a useless measure and a fruitless endeavour to get a meaningful measure in the first place.

If you want a bunch of opinions on the usefulness of an article then we have votes already.

Obviously I don't have the context of a mod, so if there are specific cases where you need a bias rating, however flawed, to do that job effectively then sure but I think that's best developed as say a browser extension (or maybe one exists already) so it's at least opt in.

EDIT: Also want to say I appreciate both the call for feedback and also the decision to opt out of the bot for now.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sorry for any confusion. We're moving away from bias - that's the goal, at least.

News source being "shit" examples:

  • A Voice for Men
  • The Activist Mommy
  • Adams County Times
  • Akron Reporter
  • Albany Standard
  • American College of Pediatricians
  • Ames Today
  • Antelope Valley Today
  • Baltimore City Wire
  • Benton Times
  • Bloomington Leader

I could go on, but I'm at work right now.

[–] stormesp@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can you tell me how many articles from those sources were shared the last month? Because i havent seen many or any at all, but meanwhile i have seen Al jhazeera and other news outlets being called not credible without much basis. If the information shared on an article is not factually correct, you can write a message or edit the title so people can know it or even remove the thread if it can be harmful, but what the mod team here is doing is just absurd. The goal should be to get rid of the bot already.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

look at the mod logs for removed posts.

[–] stormesp@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Thank you for confirming that having a bot leave a shitty opinion about how trustful that source is or not is not needed. Unless you are saying that the threads removed due to not having a reliable source is based on mbfc, which would be extremely funny and sad at the same time.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Right, so remove the shitty ones and don't bother everyone else with it?

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Glad to hear we're moving away from bias, I didn't pick up on that which could have been my fault so appreciate the clarification. All the best with your work day.