Non-binary to me is generally just an umbrella term for between or outside the binary genders (and intersex? (Should be a non-binary sex though right?)). When you say you identify as genderfluid in form of a mix of agender, non-binary, and between male and agender. Does this mean that the non-binary part is a part that exists outside of the other ones, that is more difficult to name/describe?

Also the last part (between agender and male) confuses me. Is that the assigned upon boot part? Or is it actually a mix?

I really want a mathematical representation of gender but it would be impossible to make it inclusive and useful.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

My own mathematical model of a gender spectrum matches close to that of the autism spectrum.

I visualize these spectrums in 3 dimensions but understanding that with our limited brain capacity reality could easily have spectrums with more then 3 dimensions.

Strong big macho man is one of the extremities on that spectrum a fashionista femme fatal another.

Most people are somewhere between that but ver clearly on one side. I took issue with all macho-centric competition others from my sex where involved with. I am a much more softer and emotional person. Simply lacking the desire to be the manliest man already makes me a women to some.

So i am on the male-female spectrum on the male side.

But i am also on the less expressive side of gender expression. To me its related to wether or not i am looking to mate.

I am married so i am not looking to mate so i have no reason to express either male or female features.

I believe there are opposites who are non binary / fluid but are full of genders expression, expression that could be either male or female or both at once. A key You need to remember here is that such people are really confusing for cis gendered people because they are attracted and repulsed at the same time.

Now trying to get back to mathematical perspective. One of the reasons i think that nonbinary who expresses still often loan from binary expression is because, i believe that our binary gender expression is an Emerging properties from our conscious on having a sexual body.

Or biological sex evolved binary so did our experience of gender. Now as experiment with their bodies and toys its possible we end up with some kind of sex that can Be expressed and is no sense male or female.

Furry’s come to mind. They are often also binary but i am pretty sure they have kinks that only work on their own. If you remembered the key from before. Cis gender people may only be repulsed by a furry trying to court them. A tail wagging sexually is neither male or female gender expression.

Does this help/ make any sense?