this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
129 points (85.2% liked)

Risa

6923 readers
46 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

NuTrek started when they did a full visual reboot, including completely changing the look of the Klingons: TMP.

Then it got worse, when they followed that up with a grimdark shoot-em-up that felt nothing like Trek. These people aren't even fans of the show!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

completely changing the look of the Klingons

You are talking about the TOS movies/TNG? Never understand the forehead thing either

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I’m facetiously comparing the 1979 arguments over bumpy headed Klingons to the 2017 arguments over cone headed Klingons. What’s “new” keeps on changing, but the arguments about it stay eerily familiar.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Who wanted a visual reboot of the Klingons?

Discovery had so many problems for me: ship flies on magic mushrooms, her mom basically doesn't care about her anymore by the end of it - the show-starting plot line, and the Klingons look like sweaty orcs.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, who wanted this visual reboot of the Klingons between old trek and nutrek?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What's wrong with the magic mushrooms? It's not like Trek was ever hard sci-fi when it came to how the ships fly. For crying out loud, in Voyager they went so fast they were everywhere at once, then Tom Paris and Janeway had salamander babies.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

It just felt so cliche, that the crazy discovery they make is that the strange stuff is alive. The writers couldn't make it sentient because then they'd need to explain why it's just like the Great Lake but different from the Great Lake. It just exists and Star Fleet happens to be the only ones who know about it.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who wanted a visual reboot of the Klingons?

Gene Roddenberry, I guess. IMO the guy really fell off when he turned Trek into a saturday morning cartoon show. But yeah, sweaty orc is right, just look at these monstrosities:

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lol, I love that you're conflating the creator having the budget to make the show more in-line with his original vision with someone else making a lousy change for no clear reason. It's a nice knee-slapper of a comment you have right there. Good luck with it.

[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

TV and movie productions are collaborative efforts undertaken by a huge number of creative people, and I don't think any of them make their decisions for no reason. The "original creator" of the Klingons was Gene L. Coon, who had nothing to do with their portrayal in TMP.

[–] livingcoder@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

That footnote points to an uncredited trekplace article from 2004 that itself has no citations. There was never an “original vision" that Klingons have bumpy heads, that was an idea entirely original to TMP.

Anyway, how do we feel about the Star Trek III redesign? In TMP it was one hairless bump that was supposed to represent a spinal column, running all the way from the back over the cranium. TSFS and onward, suddenly it was a flatter, wider set of ridges that was localized only to the forehead, with a full head of hair behind it. For some reason I’m always seeing people act like those are the same design, but to me the differences are glaringly obvious.