this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
465 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2313 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rich Logis, a former voter for former President Trump, appeared in a video message broadcast to the Democratic National Convention on Monday night to say that the COVID-19 pandemic showed him how Trump was “lying about pretty much everything.”

“I believed Trump,” he said. “When the pandemic hit, we needed leadership, but we were given almost nothing. It was a major betrayal to the country.”

Logis described himself as a “full-fledged member of MAGA” and encouraged fellow voters that there was still time to change their minds about whom to cast a ballot for in November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yikes. Then maybe explore how you were so easily duped. That's the real problem.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It can happen to anyone. You are not immune to propaganda.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Okay but... There's a difference between being influenced by propaganda and actively ignoring your eyes and ears, And going out of your way to be influenced by a cult of personality

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

How do you think cults operate? A cult of personality requires insane amounts of propaganda. The type of propaganda that the largest news network in the country provides. The type of propaganda that is effective at reaching vulnerable and disenfranchised people into believing hateful ideology. There have been many smart people that ended up in a cult, because that cult's propaganda was effective to them.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It also takes a mind unwilling to ask important questions or perform any kind of self reflection. No not anyone is susceptible to this.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree. There are plenty of people who are at no risk at all of joining a cult because they are not morons.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They can still get scammed tho. Or just make a wrong choice that has repercussions. It’s a six-of-one, half-dozen-of-another kind of situation.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right, so not everyone is susceptible which is all I was saying, Jesus

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What it seems like you're saying, both in your previous comment and this one, is that certain people cannot fall into a cult because effective propaganda wouldn't be effective.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Going out of your way to believe what everyone around you believes? Yeah, that's hard.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are not immune to propaganda.

"You are not immune to being convinced by something."

Nobody should be immune to that. What they should be able to do is distinguish accurate propaganda from bullshit.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not as simple as you might think. You'd be surprised what has been made into "common knowledge".

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

It could be simpler than what it is, but teaching critical thinking is very low priority, especially in the US.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This is true for nearly everyone!

However, I have been immunized by media literacy studies, digital literacy practice, reading history, having a healthy respect for the scientific method and a basic understanding of political economy.

You know--what in some jurisdictions is called schooling.

[someconditionsmayapply, immunization does not confer immunity, merely resistance, consult your local poets]

I have been immunized by media literacy studies, digital literacy practice, reading history, having a healthy respect for the scientific method and a basic understanding of political economy.

Aaaaaaaaand they're gone. You've eliminated every single Republican voter in one single sentence.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m concerned you’re not playing enough sportsball.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

lol does throwing chickens back over the fence count?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're still not immune. You've been given tools to identify something as propaganda, but propaganda works not just because people lack those skills, but because they weren't using those skills when they encountered it. Propaganda can come from anywhere, so unless you're always fact checking everything everyone says, you are not immune to propaganda.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Um, one thing that helps is reading the entire message, including disclaimers...

Also, please don't try to reduce media literacy to fact checking, you'll just get hung up on authenticity.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

That means the right propaganda could convince anyone, doesn’t mean everyone has 0 defence against it, some have more than others.