this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
1017 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2983 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lordbarbarossa@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it’s anything like Ohio it doesn’t matter what the majority wants. The republicans have drawn the maps so that they can control everything even with like 45% of the vote

[–] Bautznersenf@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the very least it shouldn't get them a republican governor.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maps don't, but vote suppression does

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maps absolutely do as does vote suppression. It can be both

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, this was specifically about gubernatorial elections - unless you have some sort of weird state electoral college thing (which IIRC only exists in Mississippi and even there only sort-of), those are generally done with a statewide popular vote, and thus independent of district maps.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By creating barriers in certain districts it's going to disproportionally going to affect those people, for example long lines, changing someone's voting district, removing someone's registration. There are tons of ways.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Right. Voter suppression. That's what they said.

[–] BratPAQ@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that what gerrymandering is?

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, gerrymandering is when you set up a district for the specific benefit of yourself. You should look it up. Stacking and packing are important terms.

My comments for examples of voter suppression

Edit: though gerrymandering is a form of voter suppression

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could just change the state constitution to allow state legislature to appoint the governor.

[–] echo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Florida state constitution requires a statewide vote to approve an amendment with 60% of the vote. If they couldn't get a governor elected they couldn't amend the constitution either.

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

All they need is to suppress votes for one election and they'll have control over the state forever.