this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
-9 points (37.1% liked)

World News

39142 readers
4804 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

from the article:

Israel stepped up its accusations in March, saying over 450 UNRWA staff were military operatives in Gaza terrorist groups. UNRWA employs 32,000 people across its area of operations, 13,000 of them in Gaza.

so according to the UN israel was off by a factor of 50, which would make UNRWA 9/13000 = 0.07% of a terrorist organization. since you seem like a zionist, if this is somehow gonna convince me to support israel's bullshit claims about aid workers in gaza, lmao. lol even.

[–] Streamwave 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Per the article, they didn't investigate all 350, the UN only investigated 19. Not really interested in that argument, though.

What do you mean when you say 'Zionist' about me? Specifically, what do you mean by that word?

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they did a investigation which discovered findings related to 19 people, one of whom was dismissed and the other 9 were deemed insufficient. it doesn't mean they only investigated 19 people and found 9, it means out of all the allegations only 19 could even be reasonably investigated, and they decided to terminate 9 people.

and by Zionist i meant a supporter of state of Israel (which you seem highly engaged in covering for them) regardless of ideology and politics. this is the most common use of the word by self identified (most of whom are evangelical christians and are zionists for very anti-semetic reasons) and the general public. stop baiting people into the gotcha "anti-semetic" debate bullshit you disingenuous fuck.

I won't respond to anything you say because new account posting lie after lie doesn't seem genuine, so go nuts in the replies.

[–] Streamwave -2 points 3 months ago

Oh god. I knew it would be this sort of low-IQ shit when I saw your @lemmy.ml address.

they did a investigation which discovered findings related to 19 people, one of whom was dismissed and the other 9 were deemed insufficient. it doesn’t mean they only investigated 19 people and found 9, it means out of all the allegations only 19 could even be reasonably investigated, and they decided to terminate 9 people.

They investigated 19 people and found 12 of them were so highly plausibly involved in the October 7th Holocaust, even by the UN's ridiculous standards which always try to absolve themselves, that they have already fired them. That's it. They're already fired by the UN because of the evidence they uncovered. They've already been fired for it.

and by Zionist i meant a supporter of state of Israel (which you seem highly engaged in covering for them) regardless of ideology and politics

OK, so the idea here appears to be that Israel is unique among all the nations of the world in that it only has a right to exist insofar as one can individually and subjectively support their government. Have I misread this?

this is the most common use of the word by self identified (most of whom are evangelical christians and are zionists for very anti-semetic reasons) and the general public

This isn't true, you just watched it on a YouTube video.

Here's an example: I'm a Zionist because I believe the Jewish people have a right to national self-determination in their ethnic and religious homeland.

Anti-Zionists therefore presumably believe that the Jews have no such right, and therefore their state – uniquely among all the states on the planet, from the United States to Australia – must be destroyed and abolished.

Which bit of that is 'incorrect' in your view, assuming you're willing/able to activate some element of your prefrontal cortex in responding?

stop baiting people into the gotcha “anti-semetic” debate bullshit you disingenuous fuck.

I haven't baited anything. I wanted to know what you meant when you labelled me as a "Zionist", in your own word(s).

Nothing you've said has convinced me that you wouldn't have been piling up 'Pro-Zionist' books on the bonfires of Berlin in 1939.

load more comments (1 replies)