this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
969 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19148 readers
3086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tarkcanis@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (5 children)

He just can't wrap his head around the idea of someone being biracial, or chooses not to, whatever.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Its the exact same shit they did to Obama. The trick is that McCain and Romney never went on record saying this bullshit. They had a gaggle of C-List news celebrities say it over and over again, while they would play the "I can't believe someone would say OBAMA ISN'T BLACK that's crazy who would think that?" game.

But Trump isn't a politician in the traditional sense. He is the C-List news celebrity who talks shit all day. The GOP doesn't want the one-eyed Navy Seal who makes serious sounding noises all day running for President. Or the elite business genius who doesn't care about all our beautiful aborted white babies because he's too busy counting his (((money))). They literally want to put William F. Buckley in office. But he's dead, so they'll settle for the Cheeto Mussolini.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad someone else remembers this bs. The right wingers attacked Obama in the same way because he was raised by a white single mother in Hawaii and later by an Indonesian step father overseas. Because these idiots don't have a word for that, they attacked him as a pretender. But let's be clear, they don't do ambiguity because complexity loses them voters.

Strangely the right wingers got something almost correct for a change. It's true that the concept of "race" is both racist and artificial. It's how you were raised that largely determines your culture. Obama wouldn't fit in in Africa. True. But he was raised as an American. THAT MEANS HE'S AMERICAN.

The same is true for Harris. Its sad that she's going to get attacked for being raised by an Indian-American-Jamacian mother in oaktown (which was predominantly black back then) because of stupidity and the great orange puff's lack of self control

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Strangely the right wingers got something almost correct for a change. It’s true that the concept of “race” is both racist and artificial. It’s how you were raised that largely determines your culture. Obama wouldn’t fit in in Africa. True. But he was raised as an American. THAT MEANS HE’S AMERICAN.

This is my handy guide to determine if someone is American (can be applied to any country):

  1. Born in America = American
  2. Born in a different country and moved to America at young age and spent a considerable amount of time growing up in America = American
  3. Immigrated at an older age to America and have their citizenship = American
  4. Immigrated at an older age to America and do not have their citizenship = Trying to become American
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

4a. Immigrated at an older age and don't want to get their citizenship, and are planning to eventually move home = Not American

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

(((money)))

Man it's been a long time since I saw this in the wild. Isn't the "(((___)))" supposed to signify "Jew" in a bad way?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Conservative bloggers thought they'd come up with a super clever code to do antisemitism without getting flagged for it, but it just turned into a big joke.

[–] n0m4n@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I looked at the echo symbol “(((___)))” in the Anti Defamation League hate symbol website. Whatever is inside the triple parenthesis has Jewish added. In this case, the echo means Jewish money.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think he would be confused regardless. The fact that she's biracial compounds it. People love to categorize others into boxes they understand. It often results in racism, but it usually results in a kind of obstinate ignorance. There are many people who fundamentally cannot seem to understand that Indians are Asian, even if they're pretty brown. They also don't understand that a Jamaican who's a descendant of slaves is African-American. That someone can be both of these impossible (in their mind) things is just outlandish.

I know a guy who's black and British, and I have heard him explain how he isn't African-American so many times. Whatever white person receives the explanation never really believes it and always treats it like it's a trick. I know someone else who has a seeing eye dog that's a mutt, and not some movie-groomed golden retriever. Confusion abounds.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 months ago

African-American? You mean, like Elon Musk?

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I don't think that he can't wrap his head around being biracial, I think he's trying to play on the community's own racism.

Let's not kid ourselves here, all racial community's have their members who shun and reject biracial kids as being part of their community with some cultures having a larger segment of that type of thinking than others.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

His entire brain is "reality can be whatever I want"

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah, he's a fucking moron, but I don't think that's it. He's trying to use a standard pratice of his of identifying something that others may like about an opponent and attack it as not being true. When that thing is race, it becomes extra fucking ridiculous.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think theyre angry because many of the Weird Cheeto's bigoted voters will want clarity on what kind of racial slur they'll use as they are a discriminating bunch.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, they really aren't as far as slurs go. If a person of mixed ethnicity kinda looks black, they get the same ones as people whose parents are both black.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was trying to make a joke but didn't succeed.😞

I've heard them call people of Indian descent the same slurs that they use for Blacks and Arabs. These are not people who get ambiguity or experience empathy.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Oops, sarcasm missed.