this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

19 readers
1 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 1 year ago
 

The unconfirmed allegation is raising concerns that the coffee chain is the latest corporation to cave to far-right attacks on LGBTQ people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yunggwailo@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cons being absolutely batshit crazy and condescending and wondering why nobody wants to treat them with respect

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I find it fascinating to hear that perspective. Among conservatives, it's widely acknowledged that the Left is crazy, and has become increasingly crazy over the years. Conservative basically means normal, ie not crazy — we like preserving traditional values, whereas the Left like violently destroying everything we hold dear. I don't mean to dispute your perspective; we're all entitled to one. I just find it interesting, and without a doubt crazy.

As for your assertion that I'm condescending, I'm sorry for whatever I said that came across that way. I am praying for you and everyone else in this thread, that we may all come to be one in Christ.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Traditional values like what? Be specific. I bet many of us would disagree that those values are worth preserving.

Can you cite any examples of physical violence committed by "the left" and what specific political objective those incidents achieved?

It's ironic that you act like the other side is unreasonable when you start with the assumption that "the left" is inherently unreasonable and impossible to have a dialogue with. You aren't leaving any room for conversation. I am willing to listen to your arguments, but we also need to be able to "agree to disagree" without dehumanizing each other.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Traditional values like what? Be specific. I bet many of us would disagree that those values are worth preserving.

If this thread about Starbucks is any measure, no almost nobody here would agree with me. Since Adam and Eve, marriage has been a holy union between one man and one woman (up until a few years ago). And by "man" and "woman" I mean strictly according to their chromosomes. Who in m/politics is going to upvote that? Anyone other than me?

(Edit: after submitting this comment, I realized I misread "disagree" thinking you said "agree" for some reason. I'm sure you're right that many here would disagree! IMHO, we should always seek to follow the ways of our forefathers who gave us this civilization.)

There's no way I could enumerate all traditional values. It'd be a 700-page book. So I'll leave the list at that one. It's one of the most important traditional values anyway.

Can you cite any examples of physical violence committed by "the left" and what specific political objective those incidents achieved?

Look, this is just so off-topic, and only shows that you don't bother to expose yourself to any non-leftist news. The past decade has been filled with a ton of answers to this question, and you can find more on a weekly or daily basis. There's no way I could list them all. There's so many that it's even difficult to choose one. All I can say is you ought to broaden your news sources.

It's ironic that you act like the other side is unreasonable when you start with the assumption that "the left" is inherently unreasonable and impossible to have a dialogue with. You aren't leaving any room for conversation. I am willing to listen to your arguments, but we also need to be able to "agree to disagree" without dehumanizing each other.

I agree, and I'm sorry. I'm just a fan of sticking to the topic, which in this case is Starbucks and pride decorations. Obviously that's a can of worms, so here we are. It's my fault for leading the conversation to the big picture without wanting to discuss the big picture. That was a mistake. Sorry. I don't mean to be shutting down conversation, and I do recognize that you have a valid point here. Maybe we'll find a different thread in the future that strikes me as more conducive to unpacking these topics.

[–] Saintzillla@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What has "the left" "violently destroyed" that you "hold dear"?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh boy, you're asking for a rant. I'm going to do you a favor and spare you the fifty paragraph reply. Sorry, you're asking a completely legitimate question if you're coming from a leftist perspective and you really don't know what I'm talking about. I'm just not going to type all of that out here.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No really, go ahead, have a rant. We will love it I promise.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As humble Christians, I'm sure you'd all eagerly learn from it how to better yourselves and become upstanding conservative citizens. So sorry to disappoint.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How odd to be so vocal about being right and then refuse to elaborate when people are earnestly and respectfully asking for your opinion. Are you secretly ashamed to preach what you actually believe?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm an advocate of staying on topic. And besides, anybody prompting me for a rant just wants to laugh at the crackpot and click the downvote button. That's not very respectful at all. Accept the word "no" if you want to be respectful.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You regularly ‘communicate’ with a man that has been dead for over 2000 years by talking to your ceiling, because you believe that (despite being dead) he has magical powers.

And then go around calling everyone else “crazy”.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That sure would sound crazy if it wasn't true. But the part about Jesus being dead is not true at all. 500 witnesses observed His resurrection (See 1 Corinthians 15:3-8.) Why do you think Christianity has spread so far and wide, and has so many converts? Why do you think the Bible has been accepted as the word of God and foundation of Western Civilization for generation after generation? Do you think our forefathers were all dumber than you? They weren't. The truth is God is irrefutably real, and you'd know that if you open your heart to receive Him.

Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

(Matthew 10:32-33)

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And dead people all over Jerusalem ‘rose from their graves and wandered around’… yeah.. sure they did bud. Whatever you say.

These are Stories. Not facts, stories. Stories written for children, about magical wizards.

You are the literal equivalent of the kid that -actually- believes in Santa Claus and can’t stop telling everyone around him that he’s the smart one who is going to get all the presents.

[–] 10A@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First off I am only four years old, and secondly, are you trying to tell me there's no such thing as Santa?

Joking.

Yes, the Bible is filled with stories. Some of them are parables to teach us moral behavior, while other stories are historically accurate. You use the word "story" as if you don't understand the difference between fiction and nonfiction. All biblical stories are either nonfiction or parables.

You're the one who seems like you're trying to prove how smart you are, by questioning the word of God. But who ever gave you permission to do that? The comfort of the Bible is that we know what to think, how to think, and how to behave. It is juvenile to question and doubt; it is mature and wise to accept God's word and do God's will.

No, I do not claim to be smart. I'm a humble servant of God.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, in the comment just prior to that one, you just used the bible as a source of evidence to prove to us all that the bible is true. I have absolutely no doubts about who you think you are.

Since you seem to love proselytising to others I’m going to reverse UNO you dude.

Try reading: ‘The Demon Haunted World’ by Carl Sagan, or ‘The God Delusion’ by Richard Dawkins.

Surely someone so confident in your faith as you can stand up to one little book can’t you? What do you have to lose but the ability to learn and grow?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I grew up an atheist, surrounded by secular culture. While I haven't read either of those particular books, I've read so many other arguments against God over the years. Yes, my faith is strong, but no, I don't desire to subject myself to the temptation to deny God. I have no doubt the books offer thought-provoking and compelling arguments, as both of those authors are intelligent. And I have no doubt that some Christians have read them and offered critiques and rebuttals, as with any opinionated book. Also I have so many books that I've bought but haven't read yet, and I'm working through them slowly, but I keep buying more! I'm pretty frugal overall, but I definitely lack some self-control when it comes to buying books. So overall, no, I won't read those, but I honestly do appreciate your recommendations. Thank you.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-loving deity create a universe with pointless suffering? Why do infants get cancer?

Why do terrible diseases like shingles and smallpox exist and why did it take humans to eradicate them? Do you think humanity was acting immorally when they created vaccines to combat these deadly viruses? Surely we were working contrary to god's will and that is a sin, right?

[–] 10A@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You'd need infinite wisdom to understand every decision God makes. I certainly don't have that. But I do trust that God's in control, and He has His reasons. And I also know that we're given challenges and tests of faith in life. That's all part of the exercise of God's creation. It's a moral test to filter us.

Do you think humanity was acting immorally when they created vaccines to combat these deadly viruses?

That's an extremely interesting question, and I wish it wasn't buried in this thread about SBC.

I find it interesting to consider the question from a Darwinian perspective first. Through medicine, we humans have nearly eliminated our own survival of the fittest. We keep our weak alive long enough to reproduce and spread their genes. The result is that we're far weaker as a species than if we took a (decidedly unethical) approach of abandoning all medicine, allowing the infant mortality rate to skyrocket back to premodern norms, and allowing common ailments to destroy us. So inasmuch as morality and Darwinianism are both held their by advocates to be "laws", yes, medicine is unlawful in a sense. (That's twisted, I know! Just interesting to consider.)

From my own Christian perspective, no, God made us in His own image, and so just as He created us, the universe, and everything in it, we create things all the time too — including vaccines. God's in control, so anything we create is something we were allowed to create. Our actions are not always condoned, as we could use any invention for good or evil. God loves life, so vaccines saving lives are good. If He really wants to take someone out, He will.

Honestly I love that question. Thanks. I hope I elaborated enough.

[–] Col3814444@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't desire to subject myself to the temptation to deny God

Can’t ever be wrong if you never ask nor answer any questions eh?