this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1140 points (87.4% liked)

Political Memes

5483 readers
2298 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Some ideals are so dangerous they need to be exterminated. If you can show me a method that does this while leaving the bigot alive, I would happily see it implemented.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you place killing an ideal beyond implementing your own you're making exactly the same mistake.

The best we've come up with is to try to ensure people are educated and well informed and only a majority can make certain decisions. Not all countries are doing too well on all 3 (heck the U.S. doesn't even manage to ensure decisions require a majority) but if an ideal gets accepted under anything resembling those conditions then killing the bigots is no longer an option.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, no.

WWII was an excellent example of how some ideologies cannot be met with peace. Shame you forgot it.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago

Absolutely not.

WWII was an excellent example of how some actions cannot be meet with peace.

If you think you can suppress an ideal with violence, you have a poor grasp of the situation.

One can respond to ideals that are bad by having a better, more effective way of life - one that addresses the underlying needs that those with bad ideals are trying to meet, and that has a path for them to join you.

But if you simply suppress it, it will fester and grow.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Education and human relation. Standing your ground in a conversation without getting combative. Being ~~winning~~ willing to fight if needed, but actively choosing not to when it's not truly necessary.

No, if you exterminate an ideal, you also lose the resistance to it and the generational cognizance of it. Instead, you let it survive, and teach people, by example, how to deal with it - not through suppression, but through response.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You just admitted my clause:

Being winning to fight of needed

No, if you exterminate an ideal, you also lose the resistance to it and the generational cognizance of it.

Yes, and it stops being relevant. Just like every dictatorial regime that has been put down.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I did not "admit your clause". Being willing to fight does not necessitate extermination.

Although, perhaps you're right, and I should adopt your ideology of ideological extermination, starting with your ideology.

No, if you exterminate an ideal, you also lose the resistance to it and the generational cognizance of it.

Yes, and it stops being relevant. Just like every dictatorial regime that has been put down.

Oh, is that what you think happens? Go live it, then, and good luck with that.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I will not abide intellectual dishonestly.

You are hereby cast out from my internet experience for all time.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago