this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43856 readers
1976 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Honestly? Alcohol. I used to work security at a rehab, and it was always the worst addiction. The withdrawls are horrible, up to and including death. Yes, even worse than heroin.

[โ€“] wewbull 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Read up on US prohibition and how it funded the Mafia. It just changes the form of the societal disease.

The answer to addiction is having support and care on place for those that fall to it so society helps pick them up again. You can't stop the abuse of substances unless you fix why people are crawling into a hole to avoid the world. Lack of mental health is a disease of society as well as the individual.

Its so mad that we have such a literal example of exactly what happens, due to prohibition, yet society refuses to see like for like. The mafia simply used the exact same routes to smuggle heroin. They didn't disappear or die out, due to alcohol prohibition ending. They got into bed with the CIA, under operation gladio. What they did with crack wasn't the first or the biggest example.

Like you said, you can't people abusing substances. They remain illegal because somewhere some very powerful people are making too much money from them remaining so.

[โ€“] Hugin@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We tried that in the US. It went very poorly.

[โ€“] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In fact in the US it can't be illegal federally without a constitutional amendment.

[โ€“] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because they saw just how badly prohibition went, shame it took them a century to catch up with weed.

[โ€“] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Weed was made illegal in the 70s, no?

[โ€“] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Nope, it was just returned to public spotlight in the 70s as a tool to fight the counterculture

[โ€“] calmluck9349@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago

I am in my late 30s. Drank in college with friends at parties. I dont anymore just not into it. I like things that make me faster, smarter, or stronger. I dont understand why all TV shows and movies seem to be centered around drinking when its a social scene. (I live in north america). Nothing good comes from drinking alcohol. They make it seem like if you're relaxing or want to have fun you need alcohol. I just need a good brisket for both those.

[โ€“] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why? Simply because this was actually tried in America? All I'm doing is answering the question. Just because this country failed at making it illegal does not mean it still shouldn't be illegal.

[โ€“] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People are allowed to make their own decisions, even if they're bad decisions. And it shouldn't be illegal because it has been proven that making it illegal only makes everything worse.

[โ€“] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

OK and I think it should be illegal, so you think however you want.