this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
100 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

59568 readers
4285 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
100
To what extent, if at all, would have CrowdStrike's faulty update have been easier to deal with with an immutable distro? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by snek_boi@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jabjoe 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can't see many Linux, or BSD, admins, being happy with "self-updating ring-0 proprietary software". That's very much a Windows culture thing.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did you hear about it when that same software had that same problem on its Linux endpoint system a couple of months ago?

Well, me neither. I can't tell how much of if is "anybody willing to use something like that will also want a Windows server" (crazy people), or "nobody that wants Linux would accept it". Those two are not exactly the same, and I don't know how well the auditors that keep pushing this kind of shit into companies interact with the culture.

[–] jabjoe 1 points 4 months ago

Yer, I didn't, but this does seams a very Windows'y way of doing things, so can't see it widely done in Linux/BSD/Unix world.