Right off the bat it's projecting vicious intent onto nature. Nature isn't just shit that happens, oh no, it's A BRUTAL WAR OF DYNASTIES!!!!1!!! soypoint-2

"Look at this centipede from the Devonian, but invertebrates wouldn't be the ones to win the game of survival" WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WHAT GAME? INVERTS ARE STILL HERE, THEY'RE THE MOST COMMON AND THRIVING LIFEFORM ON THE PLANET.

And of course the whole thing chooses to fixate on competition and ignore how much of nature revolves around cooperation and symbiosis.

I am begging the media (especially media that sells itself as educational) to stop speaking about nature the same way a 1930s German pseudoscientist would.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Look at this centipede from the Devonian, but invertebrates wouldn't be the ones win the game of survival" WHAT DO YOU MEAN? WHAT GAME? INVERTS ARE STILL HERE, THEY'RE THE MOST COMMON AND THRIVING LIFEFORM ON THE PLANET.

Bonies think they rule the world when the entire ecosystem would collapse if invertebrates disappear.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yup

[–] iie@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I love that graphic. I assume it's by number of species? If it was by number of individuals I guess protists would be a lot bigger

Here's a cool one that does it by biomass:

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/all-the-biomass-of-earth-in-one-graphic/

shit that thumbnail is small, if you don't want to open the article you can open the image in a new tab to see it full size

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

Yes it is by species. That biomass one is interesting too, awesome!

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm actually amazed how high up the ladder humans are on that one.

Even using 'mass' as a metric of success isn't fair to birds, who evolutionarily must keep a very low weight.

Do hollow bones make you a less successful species?! maddened

[–] Hexamerous@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Then again, we probably killed a large chunk of the ones below us. There's still room to climb, just wait until ocean acidification really starts kicking in.

[–] CyberSyndicalist@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

more biomass of viruses than of mammals wowee

[–] iie@hexbear.net 2 points 4 months ago

I think most of the viruses are bacteriophages

Bacteriophages are among the most common and diverse entities in the biosphere.[2] Bacteriophages are ubiquitous viruses, found wherever bacteria exist. It is estimated there are more than 10^31^ bacteriophages on the planet, more than every other organism on Earth, including bacteria, combined.[3] Viruses are the most abundant biological entity in the water column of the world's oceans, and the second largest component of biomass after prokaryotes,[4] where up to 9x108 virions per millilitre have been found in microbial mats at the surface,[5] and up to 70% of marine bacteria may be infected by bacteriophages.[6]