this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
102 points (73.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If he bows out, I'll breathe a sigh of relief. In a way, it doesn't matter if he had a cold and jet lag during the debate, and he's tip-top now. In fact, I've watched footage of him since the debate, and it seems to be true. He's back to his normal self.

But the political damage could be too much, regardless of his actual health.

At the same time, if he doesn't bow out, I will gladly crawl through broken glass to vote for him.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's July. Who the fuck is supposed to replace him? These articles are fuckin pointless.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There is someone in office right now whose only real job is to step in if the President can no longer do the job. Remember her?

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Kamala Harris has the elect-ability and personality of a potato that you left on the counter for too long and it grows eyes.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I compare her more to broccoli or peas. Nobody's favorite food, but gives you the proper nutrients to fight fascism. Now shut up and eat your peas.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it’s Harris we’re toast. Plain and simple. If I’m proved wrong in that, no one would be happier than me.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 4 months ago

Polls show her doing as well as Biden.

The thing that's going to win this election for the democrats is abortion. Harris might be good on that aspect of the race.

[–] CluelessLemmyng@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah she isn't inspiring, which is what we need. If she came out today, though, and said she will bring the law down on the GOP's corrupt elements... That might win enough hearts and minds to stir folks out to vote for her. And a good VP pick would inspire further confidence.

But she would really have to hit the ground running and improve her image.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The odds of that are abysmal.

[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 5 points 4 months ago

Which was potentially the previous three years

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Buttigieg, Newsom, AOC, Kamala, etc, etc, etc. take your pick from any of the prominent Democrats.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I was just thinking that AOC isn't old enough but she turns 35 in October, good timing.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

AOC/Bernie 2024! “Time to Take Out the Trash!”

[–] rwhitisissle@lemy.lol 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"And in a historical turn of events, every member of the DNC over 50 has elected to just...not vote this November. Calling it a once in a generation political upset, mainline Democrats have almost unanimously elected to...not elect anyone. One such non-voter was on record not outside of a polling station saying 'I can't in good conscience vote for someone who actually seems to stand for something. It's just not what you're supposed to do as a Democrat and it's not in accordance with any beliefs I might have had, if I had ever decided to have any.'"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Pfffffth. Yeah no.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yep, I had checked her age the other day because I knew she was close. I don't think all the right of center Dems like Biden and Pelosi would get behind someone that progressive. They want someone that is going to play the both sides game, and play everything safe and like it's 1990 and we don't know that in 2024/2025 Republicans are going to try to burn the whole thing to the ground.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Got to wait another cycle or so until all the old fucks die off.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC,AOC, AOC, AOC, AOC.

ABSOLUTELY Has my vote. But we have to wait a cycle or two for the old fucks to die off before she has a real chance.