this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
36 points (78.1% liked)

Discussions related to Infosec.pub

1128 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
jerry@infosec.pub
36
Blocking sh.itjust.works (infosec.pub)
submitted 1 year ago by jerry@infosec.pub to c/infosecpub@infosec.pub
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hi all. I am going to implement a block for sh.itjust.works. I am going to need years of therapy from all the nasty crap coming from that instance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] garrett@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure. To be frank, I'd prefer they sort out their moderation inconsistencies and get federated again but as it is, Jerry's gotta deal with reviewing every single report from a member of this instance.

[–] Avian_Carrier@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

…he has to deal with every single report anyway. He’s the only admin. That’s not a good excuse imo.

[–] garrett@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure I see the logic of subjecting him to an outsized number of bad reports from a single poorly moderated instance rather than just defederating until they can become better aligned with their own stated rules. Perhaps you’d be better suited managing your own instance?

[–] Avian_Carrier@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, that's a two way street. I also don't see the logic from you two. All I see is over-sensitivity. But no, I wouldn't be better managing my own instance. If I wanted to do that I wouldn't be here to begin with.