Greentext

4459 readers

707 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

169

Anon doesn't like simps (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Who knows, maybe 99% of women have died by the year 2035.

[–] abcd@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Hope my math checks out. If not I’m sure someone else will correct it:

I was just curious: With a projection of 9.000.000.000 people living in 2035: If 99% of the woman died as you said this would be 45.000.000 living woman. This would result in a population of 4.500.000.000 people in total. So we need to find a reason why half of the total population died 😉