this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

Futurology

1765 readers
284 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NucleusAdumbens@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Even after reading the article, I really don't understand the use case. Aside from biodegradability, but that doesn't necessarily require it to be edible to humans. Robots could just deliver the food without being eaten, and then be reused, which seems way more practical/cost-effective. Similarly for health monitoring stuff, wouldn't it be better if it was designed to be completely inert/durable and then excreted? If anyone understands this better please explain, genuinely baffled

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's a justification for useless technology.

"Hey, we have an idea that has no practical use-case...BUT, we can make it edible. Amirite?"

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Maybe edible nanobots that can go in and do stuff then be digested for exfiltration?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Or just make food that isn't also a robot?